Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
10%of 10 is 1.
5% of 90 is 4.5.
Inner cities with a lot of black, Latino and other ethnic minorities did vote Democrat. In the Mid-West did poor white people swing it for Trump?
Can a candidate unite Americans on the income level rather than the colour of their skin?
Or should that be when will a candidate unite Americans on the income level rather than the colour of their skin?
I don't believe Democrats have done much to look after the poor and up to the lower middle-class Americans. They want decent paying jobs not handouts.
|
paul you target again the wrong matter.
IF people with low education vote for the wrong thing you should not call them guilty you should change the education level.
we all know that good education in USA is not available for all - it is available for the rich only they are mainly white.
all effords to change that in the past were prevented by the republicans because they are representing the rich elite what could not survive without all this low educated.
this elite wants you to work hard and spend all your money right away. they want you to believe in advertising and give them easy answers for they low educated minds.
US does not really have a tax problem - it has a society problem were rich people can steal everything and make whoever guilty for it.
and it have an education problem because people get teached to believe that bullshit.
look at all the big US companies and where they make their money. they donīt make it inside US. if they have to survive with the US market you can close Amerca within 2 month and give it back to the indians.
only the value of the 3 biggest US companies is higher than the US household but they pay less tax than anyone else. Why is it like that?
I will tell you why. Because these companies make the MAYOR PART of their income OUTSIDE of US. they pay taxes in this countries (what makes sense) and they make profits.
BUT - if they bring this profits back to US they have to pay THE FULL TAX AGAIN on profits what have been already taxed in the countries where thy made.
so they do a fuck and bring them back. Just Google and Amazon have (legally) trillions of profits outside the US and they would bring this money back in to the country if they would have the same right as a natural person who is wideley protected from double tax payment.
from my point of view it does not even make sense to charge ANY tax on such money. because it is realized (and taxed) in another country - so if this money comes back to united states it has for me the same quality as money what is brought by a tourist who travels to USA and spend his money there for hotel, food, car-rental and whatever.
if I would be the "king of USA" i would not charge a cent on that money if I know that this money from outside find itīs way to the US inner money circle and produce work and prosperity there.
for me THIS is the final goal of a global market. pay tax where you make it and spend it wherever you want.
THAT would bring countries in competition with PROSPERITY !!!!
i think, that the real goal for the human world is not in any extreme direction - it is in the middle between all extemes.
ALL problems of the world would be resolved, if countries would not compete with throwing people out but bringing people in.
every living person - no matter if rich or poor - need to spend money and as long it is not burned down in the garden it will bring prosperity to the next who receives it.
if you and all other amateur economists would understand that facts one day you would see the political mistakes clearer as you do now.