Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire
We have imagined the concept of nothing into our reality, some accept it, others do not. To accept that "nothing" exists/existed you must have faith because you cannot rely on the experience, or memory, of "nothing".
The observer isn't necessary for the concept of "nothing" to exist. Just remember that for you to conceive "nothing" your mind has to imagine something void of everything, the perception of the unperceivable.
My opinion is the recent push for the acceptance in the belief that there is/was the existence of a "nothing" is religion riding on the back of physics for validation that our existence is a miracle from something so powerful it gifted all that we know out of "nothing".
Think about this: Who/what benefits from you accepting that a void in perception "nothing" exists/existed? Science doesn't benefit. Logic doesn't benefit. Physics doesn't benefit. Only religion benefits.
If you believe that "something" has always existed, then there is no higher power that created all you know from... "nothing".
|
i am not religious at all and what i am talking about is also far from any religion. it is possibly the opposite of it because modern science can give meanwhile many answers on things what have been reserved for mystics and religion.
our brain is not even able to imagin "nothing" because not one of us have ever seen nothing. if you llok into an empty room and you even take the walls away you will still see space - and space is already something - without space also no time would exist and that makes the religious answer what was before space unlogic. because if there is no space there is no time and where is no time there canīt be a before.
so it looks like the answer is, that in the beginning of time "nothing" has just split in all positive and negative parts - and this is all what we see and what we are and what is happening around us. the only last and unanswered question is what made "nothing" to fall in its positives and negatives.