Originally Posted by makko2

Freedom of speech is open to anyone - it's a matter of consequences and where the platform is; if private property owners don't want certain inflammatory hatemongers speaking on their territory it's their own right to do so at that point - particularly where safety is concerned resulting from intended intentionally divisive inciting rhetoric known to be used by the talkers.

Right-wing extremist speeches are on the same deviant anti-social level as child-porn advocacy. In 1933 and 2016 we saw the results of freedom of lunacy regressively change the world.