Quote:
Originally Posted by thommy
what she really said is:
Der Ansatz für Multikulti ist gescheitert
what means:
The approach for multiculturalism has failed
it is a big difference between this 2 sentences what you can only know when you speak german.
|
So allowing millions more in is a better approach?
Quote:
but what it shows you is that Merkel is not the person what can not admit a mistake (what is more than any other politician can)
and it shows you also that she does not move the responsability on someone elses shoulder (also a very widespread habit of politicians).
|
She admits it's a mistake after Germans started to vote against her.
Quote:
nope - when the refugee crisis came up she acted human and assumed that all other european countries will do the same.
as that did not happen - she tried to fix the problem alone what brought a lot of chaos because Germany did not even have enough offices and professional officers to handle such a mass.
and YES - the suffering of these people was also used in large parts of criminals to come into the country (which would not have happened if the load had been split)
|
She encouraged them to enter the EU without consulting other EU countries. And most certainly without asking Europeans. You ignore the facts they are free to walk around the EU. Did she act like a dictator? She did not assume they would all do the same, she made demands they do the same. Now you assume other countries should fall in line and take criminals who exploited her mistake.
Quote:
that might be a reason but the problem on that is that these "social concerns" are widlely fake news and propaganda (even when is have true aspects).
the problem is that people prefer the conspiracy theories of truth and therefore no politics can happen on the basis of the reality.
this propaganda instrument of the spread of lies is now used by every political direction as a weapon in a dirty war, in which the stupid will become unknowingly helpers.
|
There are no conspiracy theories over the sex crimes those migrants committed.
Quote:
how can she be a traitor if she is acting with this kind of humanity what is written in our constitution?
how can she be a traitor when she leads the country out of one of the biggest crisis as the ultimative economic winner?
please explain me how it can happan that ALL FACTS AND NUMBERS are showing the opposite of what would be when you are right
|
Because she acted on behalf of the EU without consulting the EU. If she had arranged to fly them directly into Germany and made sure they all stay in Germany, that would have been fine for Germany.
I agree with you that Germany is strong economically. Which then begs the question is Germany as a member and a full supporter of the EU wanting to see it grow in power, ready to pay the rising bills of other EU States? Or is it all about Germany?
They can't have it both ways.