Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue
Here is a list of most of the countries/territories that were once, or still are, part of the British empire:
So of all of the people that "did not ask" to be made part of the British empire, what is the difference between those that are currently carrying out terrorist attacks in Britain and those that are not?
Think about it for a minute before you answer.
.
|
Antigua and Barbuda - have prosperity - brits did not take them to england
Australia - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
The Bahamas - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Bahrain - HAVE TERRORISTS but also prosperity
Barbados - same as Bahamas
Belize - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Botswana - have Terrorists
Brunei - have prosperity
Canada - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Cyprus have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Dominica have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Egypt - MANY TERRORISTS
Fiji - never came to europe and live THEIR OWN CULTURE
The Gambia - donīt have knowledge enough to answer that
Ghana - HAVE TERRORISTS
Grenada - never came to europe and live THEIR OWN CULTURE
Guyana - never came to europe and live THEIR OWN CULTURE
Hong Kong - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
India - would be terrorists but the globalization starts giving them prosperity
Israel - was never part of the british empire as the state israel
Iraq - TERRORISTS
Jamaica - too stoned to be terrorists
Jordan - TERRORIST NET
Kenya - TERRORISTS
Kiribati - peaceful indians - but will come when their islands are gone in 30 years
Kuwait - some terrorists
Lesotho - terrorits
Malawi - terrorists
Malaysia - some
Singapore - - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Maldives - a lot of terrorist potential but never braught to europe
Malta - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Mauritius - - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Myanmar - have to much to do with war in their own country
Nauru - donīt know enough about that
New Zealand - - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Nigeria - terrorists
Pakistan - Terrorists
Qatar - not sure about that but never have been directly in terror attacks
Saint Lucia - - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Saint Kitts and Nevis- have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Seychelles - - have prosperity - brits BROUGHT people there
Sierra Leone - Full of terrorists
Solomon Islands - no clue
South Africa - having their own problems - they fight the white in their own country
Sri Lanka - potential
Sudan - Terrorists
Swaziland - Terrorists
Tanzania - donīt know
Tonga - indians who doe not know anything and would never want to go
Trinidad and Tobago - same
Tuvalu- same
Uganda - terror since country exists
United Arab Emirates - terror breeders
United States - terror sponsors - selling arms to terrorists
Vanuatu - indians what will come in 30 years also
Yemen - Terrorists
Zambia - not sure
Zimbabwe - potential terrorists
and yes i know EXACTLY what you want to say what the difference is.
and yes i agree that some smart muslims used their religion to brainwash people and use them for it. and they have been FUCKING successful.
and we will make them every day a bit more sucessful when we start to hate the MAJORITY of muslims who are NOT YET terrorists.
if that would happen (and if we go on this way it WILL happen) we have not only 5% of religious idots against us. we will have 100% against us because we prove that we hate them all.
imagine what will happen on the day when EVERY muslim in the world is ready to die for allah. if this will happen we are all dead. or do you doubt that ?