Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
They would rather wonder into my neighborhood and break in to my garage (B&E) and steal something that they can sell to eat (some of these newly desperate poor anyway) -- I will pay for them anyway by my increased property insurance costs. People that do not have an established work ethics are not going to adapt easily just because you starve them.
People newly entering the workforce having completed their schooling will have no interest in taking these jobs that are menial jobs beneath the abilities they have been schooled for. Even if they do take these poor quality jobs they will harbor a resentment.
This BIGLY job increase is really a lose-lose from what I see. I would rather see the US government fund basic research incubator jobs that these newly trained workplace entrants are qualified for -- there are ways to offer opportunities at low starting wages with profitability incentives or goal based incentives -- people learn work ethics -- if you force someone to work the best you will do is create a resentful and docile slave most of the time. Let some hard working Guatemalan lady change the bed linen and clean the toilet in your hotel room. If some immigrant is happy flippin' your burger he won't be spitting in it before it gets wrapped and sent down the line.
|
"People that do not have an established work ethics are not going to adapt easily just because you starve them."
WTF? because WE starve them? No, they starve themselves when they didn't finish high school, didn't get any additional training, then decided to have kids when they had no job. You have the balls to say WE starve them? You are wrong, people adapt the fastest when they're left with no other options. IF they break the law then they go to jail, most will adapt. IF they don't then a new AI powered system will replace that cheap job you think we MUST fill. What do people say here? Adapt or die?