06-07-2017, 03:22 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,623
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeworks
Will they ban their own highly intrusive adverts and throw away billions? Or charge more for the only advert network allowed by their blocker, their own? It's just another way to tighten the stranglehold on internet traffic and advertising by 'helping'.
|
From the article:
The warning is meant to let websites assess their ads and strip any particularly disruptive ones from their pages. That?s because Chrome?s ad blocker won?t block all ads from the web. Instead, it?ll only block ads on pages that are determined to have too many annoying or intrusive advertisements, like videos that autoplay with sound or interstitials that take up the entire screen. |
|
|