Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Oh yeah? What am I making up?
|
Well, you said "No pressure from Drumpf administration on Russia probe" when that is NOT what the article says. The article says "Intelligence chiefs won't say if Trump asked them to downplay Russia probe". I already mentioned this. You lied about them saying there was "no pressure". They did not say that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
I just linked you to the brand new CNN story that refutes what they themselves have been reporting non-stop and crediting it to the Washington Post without doing ANY due diligence to confirm the story.
|
So the Washington Post says there was pressure and the CNN report says "they refused to answer if there was pressure". You are trying to play one report off of the other, claiming they say different things. They do not. One says "there was pressure to end the investigation" and the other says "they refused to answer questions on if there was pressure to end the investigation".
You can't seem to see the difference. CNN is NOT saying there was "no pressure to end the investigation". This is what you are implying. Instead, CNN is saying they refused to answer questions on if there was pressure in open testimony.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Freakin' Carl Bernstein has been on CNN for months bragging about how the Washington Post has put him in charge of over 20 "reporters" whose ONLY goal was to cost Drumpf the election and now to "uncover" "bad" things about him to destroy his Presidency.
|
I don't know who Carl Bernstein is and do not care. However, it comes as no surprise that a major newspaper such as the Washington Post would assign twenty reporters to find out the truth about President Trump. Even more so after the Washington Posts role in Watergate.
If a major newspaper can find criminal acts that leads to the impeachment of a US President, isn't that their responsibility? Isn't this exactly what investigative reporting supposed to be?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
What happened today on Capital Hill was that a "major news story" from the Washington Post that has been reported as "fact" by CNN was proven to be yet ANOTHER made-up fake news story.
|
Again, you are trying to spin the CNN story as debunking the Washington Post story. It does not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
I told you months ago that you need to open your mind and let go of your irrational "hate Trump" emotions. You didn't listen and you keep making pronouncements that turn out to be false because you simply won't accept that CNN is totally 100% anti-Trump biased and will "report" ANYTHING that sounds bad...no matter if it's fake or not.
|
I have opened up my mine, and so far to date everything I thought Trump would be as president has been 100% correct. He is horrible, has no political or government or military experience, and has no clue of what he is going. None what so ever.
I do not believe CNN is "anti Trump". I believe CNN is reporting the news. CNN is not my only source of news; I do not rely on one source of news but instead multiple feeds for news (which includes Fox News). ALL of the news agencies are telling me the same exact thing - which even includes Fox News (Neil Cavuto) which slammed Trump last night. All of the news is telling me the same exact thing:
- Nothing is being accomplished
- Walking away from the Paris agreement was bad
- No word on the budget yet
- The healthcare bill seems hopeless
- Approval rating is in the crapper
- We have five investigations looking to Trump working with the Russians, stealing the election, and obstruction of justice.
We are five months in and Trump has accomplished NOTHING.