Originally Posted by crockett

I think you do not understand what a Grand Jury is..


Although grand juries and trial juries are both made up of average people who were called for jury duty, they serve very different purposes. A grand jury determines whether charges should be brought against a suspect, while trial juries give a decision about whose facts they believe in the trial itself.

Grand juries will work closely with the prosecutor, who will explain the law to the jurors. The jurors then have the power to view almost any kind of evidence they wish and to interrogate anyone they like. The procedure for grand jury hearings is very relaxed to allow the jurors as much flexibility as possible. Typically, the parties that appear before the grand jury do not have attorneys, and the rules of evidence allow much more evidence than is allowed at a criminal trial. Grand jury proceedings are held in strict confidence to encourage witnesses to speak freely, as well as to protect the suspect if the grand jury decides not to bring charges.

A grand jury's decision is not the final step in a case. Prosecutors use grand jury proceedings as test-runs for trials and take a grand jury's decision very seriously. However, if the prosecutor strongly disagrees with a grand jury, he or she may ignore the decision.


A grand jury is a "fishing trip" as an attempt to see if they can build a case which a jury will convict. If they had a case right now they wouldn't need a grand jury. The very fact they want a grand jury shows they have a weak case.

The entire purpose of a Grand Jury is to "determine" if charges should be brought. It doesn't mean they have a case. If they had a case they wouldn't "have" to use a grand jury. They would instead make the charges and take it to criminal court. (ie they don't have a case, they just want it to be a case)



Regardless, if they did something wrong we should find out, but I suspect this is just Trump trying to get payback..