Quote:
Originally Posted by 2MuchMark
Hi Robby,
I think its important.
For the first meeting, there were other people with him, like Rex Tillerson, the Russian foreign minister (Lanov? I forget the name), and translators. Having several people in a meeting like this is a good idea and helps keeps everything clear between all parties.
The second meeting was private, except for a Russian Translator.
It's also important because the meeting was undisclosed. Why would this meeting be undisclosed?
Libby/Righty viewpoints & opinions aside, this seems unusual, and only serves to reduce trust in Trump.
The hot story of the moment are the indicators that Trump colluded with Russia to steal the election. Undisclosed meetings like this certainly do not do anything but fuel this story...
Cheers!
|
Mark, if you read what I said earlier you would know that this was a dinner for the leaders and their wives only.
Tillerson wasn't there. And even if he was...he's LOWER on the totem pole than Trump.
These are the two leaders. Nobody is higher up.
That would be like you and I going to the INTERNEXT CEO Dinner and sitting a few feet away from each other but NOT speaking because we didn't have employees with us???
The whole POINT of the dinner for the G20 is to get leaders to talk to each other.
This is just more media nonsense. It wasn't a "secret meeting" as Rochard keeps using giant fonts to scream hysterically.
It was a dinner for the leaders of the G20.
It's designed for conversation.
If not...then what's the point of the dinner? Was it absolute silence in the room?
Were none of the other leaders talking to each other?
Think about it for a second out of the prism of the media's nonsense.