Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam
?It is proper, constitutional, and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part of, and are contrary to, the president?s official duties,? the Starr office memo concludes. ?In this country, no one, even President Clinton, is above the law.?
Did someone think otherwise?
There has to be enough evidence to return an indictment.
A President could be impeached alter a conviction of a crime in office as mentioned.
|
You are aware that detectives don't tell the public as they gather evidence right?
These Trumpers who say there's no evidence are idiots. The reason Mueller has expanded his team to over 30 specialized investigators AND
prosecuters is because he has a lot of evidence. A special counsel doesn't hire specialized money laundering prosecuters, unless his investigators have evidence.
"Carr confirmed to The Washington Post that Brandon Van Grack, a Justice Department national security division prosecutor; Rush Atkinson, a trial attorney in the fraud section; and Andrew D. Goldstein, who had headed the public corruption unit in the U.S. Attorney?s Office in the Southern District of New York; and Zainab Ahmad, an assistant U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of New York specializing in terrorism cases, also had been assigned to work with the group.
Goldstein had worked in the office under U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who was fired by Trump after he refused to resign upon request and who has said publicly that he had unusual exchanges with the president.
Ahmad was recently profiled by the New Yorker for having prosecuted 13 terrorism cases without a single loss."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...nder-scrutiny/