you are showing yourself up here as someone who has no clue what just happened. Nothing wrong with that in itself, but trying to score points from something you don't grasp, and wrongly interpret to make whatever is in your head the actual scenario, is making you look a bit foolish. See any of bladefail's many insane posts as an example of how everyone who understands what just happened, is seeing your quoted post above, for example.
Not understanding is one thing, I'm pretty new to crypto myself in the grand scheme of things, but as you are one of the poster's here who I don't think is a whackjob/in the middle of a mental breakdown, you might want to say nothing, instead of posting what is in fact gibberish, then trying to score points off of said gibberish.
Think: markham talking about traffic, or cam studios, or anything really other than shooting/print mags
You are doing the same thing here... operating under the misguided notion you are versed in a subject, and talking nonsense. Sorry to be blunt - I do actually like you as a poster, so I'm not trying to come at you here... take a bit of a breath though and concede you may not quite have the nuances/facts straight
ps Konda explained in a great simple example what happened, but it's clear from your quote you aren't quite getting it. Nobody 'paid for someone else's christmas' as a result of gaining BCH from existing BTC they held at the time of the fork.