Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

Remember what the US Appeals Court did with §2257?

I don't think this proposed change in the CDA will have any affect on lawful porn notwithstanding an possible effect on porn shooters-- and that is a big maybe. If you are shooting in the USA and have a permit for the production, like in California ... Using this statute to somehow restrict porn advertising or services is an overreach.

The law with the wording *activities related to prostitution, pornography, sex tourism, and other commercial sexual services.* has been on the books since 2000 so ... in 17 years there has been no attempt at any prosecution, to the best of my recall -- why is that?

Only sites advertising prostitution, and in most cases that includes escorts also, should have real worries. Servers could be seized in rem theoretically if they are operated by persons foreign to the USA.