Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
They are anonymous sources because they would lose their jobs if they came out in public. It surely doesn't make them any less valid.
So far it seems that all of the information from anonymous sources have been correct.
Do I think Podesta is involved in handing out this information? Perhaps. I really think it's someone pretty high up in the FBI or CIA. It's Deepthroat V2.
|
These assholes just show their stupidity by not understanding why an anonymous source must be anonymous. When he hears the word anonymous, it automatically means some journalist made it up...unless the shoe was on the other foot and Hilary was president. Then journalists would be his hero and the most truthful people ever to walk the face of the earth.