Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue
I don't really have time for this right now but I can check in occasionally when I do have time. For now, we could start with thommy's statement above:
How are you supposed to discuss the topic with anybody that seriously believes that? The 97% figure is a bogus claim based off of a bogus study and there is no proof of the supposed other 3% being on oil company payrolls.
Any debate is a non-starter for people like him because he has been force-fed the propaganda and he accepts it without question.
.
|
so whatever if it is 97 or 96 or 95 or 90% - it is the far bigger majority and if you research a bit for the background of the deniers you will end up in most cases at the oil and coal lobby who finance them.
https://www.theguardian.com/environm...ying-lawmakers