Quote:
Originally Posted by menxzy
I asked about Cam Model Protection on co.uk
https://gfy.com/21990349-post38.html
but dont get any reply.
From that company " Our agents search daily for illegally distributed content. Each month we report more than 150.000+ pirated links! " |
If you look at the form carefully
I consent to be served? HOLY FUCK
that means in legaleze: come and serve me a lawsuit that is my address
FUCK Them these people have assholitus -- do what ever you want.
I would just remove the content if you believe it to be infringing, if you are or your server is in the USA.
read this:
Protecting Yourself Against Copyright Claims Based on User Content | Digital Media Law Project
If anyone is a licensed attorney and wants to comment -- be my fuckin' guest
What is being missed here is that content in cam thumbs is content licensed to the broadcasting cam site, and sublicensed to its affiliates, at its time of production -- it is not infringing. The model is saying: I don't want my pictures used -- so what -- your use is legal if you have license.
In most cases as a courtesy, but not as some legal mitigation, most webcam sites will just delete the images for reason that most of these models' images are really useless and without value if they are not longer working.
If you are an affiliate using sponsor authorized content you are a copyright sub-licensee in succession.
This is all about
: my new boyfriend, I got a new job, I don't want nobody to know --- shit like that -- is what this is about.
Personally, I have always honored
any polite requests from models that are no longer working to remove their content. POLITE REQUESTS through proper channels and not fraudulent DCMA takedown notices. Offering recording captures of private shows may be a right of publicity infringement -- but their copyright is that the website, and if the transfer is non exclusive; also of the model's retained copyrights. DMCA does not cover *right of publicity* that is a civil tort (in the USA anyway). You have to file suit in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Person..._jurisdictions every country has different laws.
This is just a cheap shot
the problem is some courts have ruled that linking to infringing content is infringement. Without foreknowledge Google has safe harbor -- if they remove the infringing link. You are guilty unless you can prove you are innocent and that is contradictory to US law -- DMCA is a US Law. Welcome to fucking internet court :P