i have some thoughts i wanted to share with wise ppl here ;)
wanna hear what you guys think about it.
1. government can create act of terrorism (a bit too conspiracy theory)
2. government can ALLOW act of terroris (a more likely option)
3. to introduce new laws giving govt more control over population. (we have seen this already)
4. driving truck to crowd, bombing, shootings - all of this from govt POV is nothing, it's no real damage, "just" few deaths and then govt can introduce new laws it's a win situation for government.
now what leads me to all of this:
if terrorism would be real and not ALLOWED and CONTROLLED if terrorists would be real and serious ppl, not some poor morons from 3rd world countries they would try something more damaging like diseases:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plague_of_Justinian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Death
ofc we can outheal most of it now, but death toll would be higher than bombing, shooting or truck crowd driving cuz before doctors in some areas would diagnose it it would be to late for many patients. this is real damage, real terror but it's terror govt can't really controll cuz it can spread to much and this is why i think what we are taught to name terrorism is in fact fake.
now, i'm sure some of you are educated enough - tell me how hard is to acquire some mortal disease strain (require labs and talented people)? it's not easy am i right? but i can't believe that terrorists didn't tried to get it. ain't it's perfect for their agenda? unless like i stated above they are really under watch and controll and can't cause serious damages.
what do you think guys?