If there is nothing to see here, why are they working so hard to cover it up?
Take Jeff Sessions. He had three meetings with the Russian Ambassador. Why would Jeff Sessions, at the time a United States Senator, be meeting with the Russian Ambassador three times? He claims the meetings were part of his work on the Committee on Armed Services, but this doesn't remotely make sense. None of the other twenty-six members of the Committee on Armed Services have meet with the Russian Ambassador, nor should they. Why would someone on the Committee on Armed Services be meeting with the Russian government?
Okay, let's just say these meetings - which he failed to remember under oath - are legit. He filed a report with the State Department, right? Isn't this standard when someone from our government meets with a ranking member of a foreign government? Just release that report and this will be quickly resolved. Or did he not report this to the State Department? Is it possible we have Senators and members of Congress running around and having meetings with ambassadors and no one is tracking any of this? No problem. The CIA seems to know what the Russian Ambassador reported to Moscow, so... Just release that. This will quickly put all of these rumors to rest. It's going to come out sooner or later, might as well be now to prove Jeff Sessions is innocent of any wrong doing, and also prove that Jeff Sessions was acting in the best interests of the United States Government.
|