View Single Post
Old 12-03-2017, 08:37 PM  
mineistaken
See signature :)
 
mineistaken's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ICQ 363 097 773
Posts: 29,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
So what you're saying is that the New York Times is wall to wall opinion.
not wall to wall, but a lot. And even 1% is too much for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
I'll educate you on a simple concept. Reporting what happened is not opinion. Just because you don't like that news is bad for Donald Trump doesn't make it opinion.
Don't be naive. It is usually not just reporting, it is how it is reported, even what words are chosen to describe t and so on.

Secondly - when Donald does 5/100 level shit it gets reported as if it is some 50/100 level shit. When crooked does 50/100 level shit it is downplayed as 5/100 etc etc.

Crooked lined her own pockets using the power of her office, this is literally worse than 99% of the shit Donald did, but most of that 99% Donald shit was reported thousand times more. Just as an example.

Thirdly - Donald holding water bottle is not news worthy to any sane person. Any outlet pretty much discredits itself by publishing such "news".
mineistaken is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote