Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
Even the breaker of said fake news is back peddling..
"We stand by our story ? which never said Mr. Trump?s own records were requested. "
https://global.handelsblatt.com/fina...mueller-861828
Keywords here are "a subpoena"
Manafort banked with Deutsche Bank
/endfakenews |
Your quoting is very very selective.
Let me quote the passage in full:
According to our information, the subpoena from Mr. Mueller, who is investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 US elections, is in connection with Mr. Trump?s camp, requiring the bank to provide information on financial transactions and loans. It remains unclear whether the subpoena relates to the US president personally or a family member. Given that qualification, we are standing by our reporting. Other media that have since picked up on Handelsblatt?s original story, including the Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and Bloomberg, are sticking by their reporting, too. Neither Mr. Mueller?s spokesperson nor Deutsche Bank would comment on the report. The bank said in a statement that it cooperates with all investigations and wouldn?t reveal details of individual cases.
So why are you saying this is fake news ?
Are you saying the subpoena does not exist ?
Are you saying the subpoena has no connection to Mr Trump ?
Are you just saying the word fake because it makes you feel better ?
Enquiring minds.....
