Originally Posted by Rochard

The entire thing was ridiculous. They had no right to interview them about the investigation. They had no right to put under oath. And they had on valid reason to ask such questions that were unrelated to the original investigation.

That's fine. The Republican party established, through Kenneth Starr, that we can in fact put a sitting president under oath for an investigation, and then ask him if he has ever cheated on his wife.

Do you see where this can go now? We now have a perfectly valid reason to put Trump under oath, and we now have a valid reason to ask Trump if he has had sexual relations with any of the sixteen women who have accused him of whatever. When he lies under oath about not knowing them, or not being there that day, we can charge with lying under oath.

#winning.