Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda
I have enough experience that I would have many more factors to evaluate than you do at this point. see my other post
|
Ok, will you have few minutes to spare and indulge me by answering my specfic questions?
These are:
1.
My 10 year old
https://www.cnet.com/products/sony-c...ot-w180/specs/
New one from same cybershot series:
https://www.cnet.com/products/sony-c...ot-w810/specs/
I would assume new one should be better (as new and not 10+ year old tech), but which specs do suggest that it is better?
(forget about megapixels and zoom as these are not important for me)
How come f/ is worse in the new w810 comparing to w180? And is it bad that it is worse or no big deal
2.
Every review says that canon
ixus 185 (ELPH 180) is better than sony w810 (specs link above)
Which specs would suggest that? Which specs would you look at?
3.
Same pair as in the question #2.
Some guy who used both compared:
"I'd say the canon. I've used the Sony, doesn't focus quick, takes blurry photo's and terrible in low light."
Which exactly spec is indicating these three things:
a) focus quickness
b) blurriness level
c) being better/worse in low light
Again, if you could answer specifically every question separately.
Thanks