Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
#1 ) I've seen many of you accuse the FBI of plotting aginst Trump and trying to villify them as has right wing media. Usually the rational is claims some FBI agent liked Hillary or claims that things like the dossier is fake because someone in the DNC paid for it and so on..
Let's just assume that's a reasonable reason to lay doubt on the Russia investigation.. Let's say I give you that as reasonable doubt..
Now my question is.. Why do you not hold Devin Nunes and Jeff Sessions to that same standard? Why is it ok to have Trump using the DOJ to interfere with the FBI investigation and why don't you call for Nunes to be removed as part of the investigation when he was part of Trump's team..
Seems you guys are supporting a double standard here so explain why the same rules should not apply to your guys that you expect applied to everyone else?
#2) While Obama was president, while Clintion was president, we sat through countless investigations which were obviously politically motivated in my opinion, but once again, let's give you guys the benifit of doubt and assume you really wanted to see if wrong doing was done..
Why now the sudden change of heart? Why are you guys so scared of the FBI investigation into Russia interfering in our election? Why not just let it run its course like Clintion did with the Kenneth Star investigations and Obama did with the countless Benghazi investigations? Again why not hold yourselves to the same rules you thought others needed to be held to?
|
i think the question is much easier:
if there is nothing - why does he try so hard to finish that investigation and fires all and everyone who is in charge of that.
if the truth is: there was nothing they will only find nothing.
if trump would be clean in that he would sit and smile and wait til they find NOTHING.
one does not need more than an amoeba´s brain to see what is going on.