Quote:
Originally Posted by Acepimp
Hey Thommy, i realize you can't help that you're mentally challenged / Low I.Q. gullible idiot, so I'll try to be nice to you.
"The repeal of the Obama-era regulation, "doesn't allow people to buy guns who have been properly adjudicated by a court of law as mentally ill or unstable."
"The Obama-era rule was designed to take away people's rights without due process of law. It would have flagged the names of people who, for example, have an anxiety disorder or depression which keeps them from working, and who, as the SSA puts it, ?need help in managing [their] personal money affairs,'"
Also, it's worth noting that there are already regulations on firearm purchases by persons who have a documented history of mental illness, or who have shown themselves to be a danger.
Reporters resurrect bogus narrative that Republicans made it 'easier' for the mentally ill to buy guns
You think an older person who let's their son or daughter manage their check book is mentally ill?? That's not accurate, and the social security administration doesn't need to be infringing on people's rights. Also, Gateway Pundit is not fake, dumbass. Now do us all a favor and... |
How many people are killed a year by a chequebook?
Taking guns away from people with suspected mental illness was a great start.
Quote:
|
The Obama administration policy "would have required the Social Security Administration to report the records of some mentally ill beneficiaries to the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System," as The Two-Way has reported. "Those who have been deemed mentally incapable of managing their financial affairs ? roughly 75,000 people ? would have been affected by the rule."
|
What's wrong with that?
Quote:
|
As we have reported, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, a leading supporter of the rule's repeal, has stated that "if a specific individual is likely to be violent due to the nature of their mental illness, then the government should have to prove it."
|
The Government has provided the data via the Social Security Administration. The individual now needs to prove he can be trusted with a gun. History tells us I'm right.
"If you can't manage your own financial affairs, how can we expect you are going to be a responsible steward of a dangerous, lethal firearm?"
