Quote:
Originally Posted by SpicyM
As the amount of content produced decline, the amount of money to be made decline too.
Hot natural girls with no tats who consider porn expect to earn much more money than they do in their normal life to become a porn performer ... Once they discover the pay is shitty (and 250€ /scene is shitty for a citizen of EU) and the amount of work per month is low , they just don't see any reason and motivation to get naked and sacrifice their privacy. So only the ugly and desperate ones get into porn for this kind of money. All the known sexy pornstars are in agencies and travel a lot shooting hi-end glamour stuff.
Personally, if I was a girl, I wouldn't do that for less than $1,000 per scene. It would not be worth it for me. Hot chicks have much more options these days, they can travel easily and they can present themselves online, as "normal" non nude photo models, expecting to pose for clothing companies.
|
A good looking girl could earn 250€ doing solo and two girls, 2-3 times a week for a year or two back in the 90s and up to 2008. An average girl who did B/G could earn £1,000 for one scene and do it once a week for the same time, a good looking girl could earn twice that. All this without being spread across the porn tube sites for everyone to see.
Today they can still earn good money on their own. Without a photographer, agent, studio, affiliates, etc taking a cut.
https://www.facebook.com/search/top/...models%20girls
I'm linked to a couple of retired photographers and models and FB continually wants to pair me up with models working webcams.