View Single Post
Old 04-06-2018, 02:29 PM  
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by brassmonkey View Post
man i have a bunch and never shot a person. it does violate right of legal owners. fuck your old ghoul ass!
No it doesnt.. because there are already bans on weapons you can obtain. You cant buy a shoulder launched RPG's, you can buy hand gernades. You have to have special permits to have full auto and can not carry them in public.

There are shitloads of gun/weapon restrictions. The govt has the right to set limits and they can limit types of guns or weapons.

The 2nd and doesn't specify what you can be "armed" with.. it doesn't say you have the right to guns or naval vessels or armoured tanks..

This is all the 2nd and says.....

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It can just as well be argued that you have to be part of a militia to have "arms".. arms could be a bow and arrow...It doesn't state firearms.. it's intentionally vague to allow states and govt to decide what is appropriate for the times.

So good a reply I only need to copy and paste.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote