Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe
Collusion is just a simplified speak for a crime as explained by Judge Nap. "They have to find something on Trump or they are going to be tried for treason" Another one of your delusions.
|
Let's break down Poltico's explanation of that.
"For example, if Donald Trump Jr. sought “dirt” on Hillary Clinton from the Russians, he might be charged with conspiring to violate the election laws of the United States, which prohibit foreign nationals from contributing any “thing of value” to an electoral campaign."
So Hillary paying for "dirt" and her conspirators using said dirt to obtain a FISA warrant isn't a crime. But DT Jr possibly seeking it is...
"The opposition dirt is at least plausibly a thing of value. And to the extent that the Trump campaign aided, abetted or advised the Russians (or any other hackers) about what would be most useful to steal from the Democrats or how best to enhance the impact of their release, they may well have violated the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. "
Grasping at straws
"Of course, none of this excuses the apparent cover-up, which is often as bad as the original crime. Lying to the federal government in your registration forms or your security application is a false statement."
Lying to obtain a FISA warrant?
"Using the wires to perpetrate your crime is often wire fraud."
LOL
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...llusion-215366
You can't start an investigation to discover a crime. You have to have a crime and then the investigation.