Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Pheer
"We don't even like aircraft carriers, so we will build the worst one ever"
Makes no sense.
|
We didn't build a single one. There is an aricraft
cruiser which was designed before A.D. by the Soviet Union to be used against small banana countries and now it's completely obsolete. We also have this:
Does it make a sense to you? Man, the elders have to die, the youth takes their place.
Course you can build an aircraft carrier group for billions of dollars and put there many thousands of personnel. On the other hand, you can made a cheap ass ultrasonic cruse missile, which is undetectable and can't be intercepted because it flies much lower the ship's deck. The missile which can sink the whole group with ease. Which way will you go in 21st century? Course if you care of your GDP (you want it big, right?), you will choose the 1st way. If you care about the efficiency and don't care about GDP or other shit like that, you will choose the second one.
The submarines are the other thing. They are quite, hidden and can release the blast power of all bombs used in WWII + Hiroshima and Nagasaki within a minute.
This is the weapon of 21st century. Not aircraft carriers, archer squads and horse cavalry. Submarines and aviation. Not some drones, those can easily be
jammed or taken under control by anyone, but the real aviation with real men aboard.