Originally Posted by Pseudonymous

I have never understood her decisions when it comes to promoting her program/content. I am sure it has to do with her doing fine without it but leaving so much money on the table and not having a brand you have 100 percent control of is strange to me. Her site could and still could do great things if she partnered with a company who knew a thing about managing that type of site in 2018. Met-art has never been one to partner up with when it comes to affiliate management. It's never been a great partnership with most who have tried going that route

Then again, I could say the same thing for most producers in this industry, you would think over time, you would meet the right people who could show you that there are much better options out there.

I think it would have allowed her to exercise new styles of content instead of sticking with what's worked for her in the past and what shes producing for Playboy.

Brings me to my other thought, I wonder why playboy didn't ever guide her into doing more relevant content. Though Playboy has told me they do intend to seek out a more relevant style of content, though hers hasn't changed as far as I can see. Twisty's/Playboy style content hasn't worked for a long time. Playboy is another case of a company catering to what their current member base wants and not realizing that is only because that's what they continue to put out. You're supposed to force some change on your members because it's what helps maintain acquiring new fans. If it was up to Facebook users, it would have never changed since it was launched, you need to listen to trends, not cater to what appears to do better temporarily

I say everything with all due respect, I just think she has had the power to change alot and create quite a nice brand on hollyrandall.com


They are releasing content producers have been sitting on for ages, content that they have been sitting on for sometime. Another case of paysites underestimating fans and not realizing fans realize the difference between content that's been sat on and new content. Nevermind that, but the lack of personal feel. The whole empty homes, designed like theyre in their grandparents home. All the euro girls as filler content, they are Playboy. There is no need for filler content, they have all the power in the world, they have an abundance of capable photogs and girls who would like to model for them in the U.S. Leave the international ones for international Playboy

Also another case of an adult company scared of changing things or investing a little in an attempt to change things because their income is dropping, so it results in a company that spirals faster than it should. Also missing the chance of being a powerhouse again. (I don't see why you can't include Hustler in this as well)

And dont get me started on their video quality, they only seem to deal with photographer's that are 9/10 in photography and 2/10 in video. Playboy apparently can't find producers in north america that are 10/10 at each. Guess that's the case when you don't actually seek them out.

Thats my vent for the day. Big brands doing things so entirely wrong will forever be my biggest pet peeve