Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
You still did not read the article I posted..because it gives the time of events very well.. but granted its a long article so you probably cant focus that long on anything telling you what you dont want to hear..
|
Let me spell it out for you
"On Friday evening, both the New York Times and the Washington Post reported that an American professor in the United Kingdom had acted as a source for the FBI"
Friday evening, yesterday..
Your article is acting as if this is the first NY Times article about him... It isn't... My post is via their first article last week... Which is how everyone put 2+2 together.. NY Times then makes the 2nd more revealing article and your source uses it to claim DC had foreknowledge when all you have to do is see as I've pointed out that MY foreknowledge preceded DC's.. That's because everyone figured it out from the first article.