Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
Attack by portraying my view with effeminate metaphors. Makes sense.
No wonder you advocate USA being nuke thugs.
And no, I already proved your "nuke man up" theory false with your own example of Korea.
I thought you were the live and let live, the government should mind its own business, dont help our own, libertarian.
Not so eh Duke Nukem.
|
Quit being so fucking sensitive man.
If I decide to "attack" you on a message board...you will know it.
What I said was pretty clear and not a "theory".
If you are dealing with civilized Europeans in a fancy statehouse then no you don't need to threaten them
When dealing with country's whose culture is more about strength and "saving face" then you must show strength.
And if you READ what the threats were pertaining to North Korea...they DID work in the 1950's. They were directed at China and forced them to negotiate.
"n 1953, Eisenhower threatened the use of nuclear weapons to end the Korean War if the Chinese refused to negotiate."
The Chinese DID negotiate and came to the table and the DMZ was created and the ceasefire that has lasted until this very day.
Chill out man. It's a discussion. If I want to call YOU a pussy...I would just do it straight up. I wouldn't allude to it.
I was pretty clearly saying that effeminate pussy diplomats can sip tea with their little pinky's extended in many situations when dealing with civilized country's.
Not so much when dealing with Kim Jung Un.
And Trump is not the first to handle things like this in a threatening way.
But since he IS Trump, and the media hate him...they paint it that way.
Remember...they did the same thing to Reagan when he called the Soviets "The Evil Empire".
OMG!!! It was the end of the world. Crazy Ronald Reagan was taunting them and was going to cause a nuclear war.
Remember?
I do.