Quote:
Originally Posted by klinton
sorry, but there is no logic at all in your posting. Or if it is, its very TWISTED (well....)...
why Russia wouldnt give them just one unit ? Much easier to smuggle and make it clandestine.
Why not ? They use DonBass situation only to destabilize, so they dont care about full engagement anyway. Just like they did in Moldova - Transnestran REpublic.
I'm like 70 % sure that firing BUK came from Russia and it was "lent". Its like you would be still negating Russian involment in Donbass situation lol. Come on ! everyone knows that Donbass/ donieck rebels get clandestine support from Russia. Why you trying so hard to deny it ? It's like arguing with person saying that black is white. or vice versa. doesnt make much sense after some time, seriously.
|
I see no logic there at all. Of course the rebels have (had?) Russian support from mercenaries to tanks and MRLS (the multiple rocket launcher systems). Why Russia was unable to deliver a BUK system as well? Why there was only one rogue unit and why the Ukrainian rebels were so proud that whey were able to capture it from the Ukrainian army hangar? As a reminder: the Ukraine uses BUKs and many of them can be find across the country.
These are
the Ukrainian news:
Militants of the "DNR" seized military air defense units with anti-aircraft complexes "Buk" at the end of June - use Google translate. Doesn't it explain where the Ukrainian rebels got that BUK and why it was not a system, but just one blind unit which could not recognize a civilian airplane?
Any questions?