Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Rupe
Yes benevolent or you would either be a slave working for us or imprisoned, most likely in your case we would have killed you. BTW your charts show how influential and what a world power that we are yet every country is still a sovereign country. Even the ones that we currently have troops engaged in battle. BTW we are benevolent enough to allow those battles to continue when we could bring them all to a swift and abrupt end and I am not talking about the use of nukes even. I am talking about all out war and "unconditional surrender" such as was our military policy during WWII. I am talking about General MacArthur's "no substitute for victory" philosophy.
|
oh so you do not keep slaves so everything is OK?
Q: so if I dropped 25.000 bombs/year on the USA but did not take slaves this would make me benevolent?
steve rupe: noooooooooooooo! we are america! you would be hitler-satan!!!! genocide!!!!
Q: but when you do the same to others you are benevolent?
steve rupe: yes we are great! we are the greatest! the double standard is the best thing ever!
it is hard to explain to some americans that bombs and invasion are very very bad things...the brain wash in the USA is much too strong...so is the double standard...dropping nukes on fishermen, using chemicals on farmers for a decade, dropping more bombs than all world wars combined, invading more countries than the roman empire in 2000 years etc...all certain signs of "benevolence"....
is there some special american dictionary where benevolent has a vastly different definition?