Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
oh so you do not keep slaves so everything is OK?  
Q: so if I dropped 25.000 bombs/year on the USA but did not take slaves this would make me benevolent?
steve rupe: noooooooooooooo! we are america! you would be hitler-satan!!!! genocide!!!!
Q: but when you do the same to others you are benevolent?
steve rupe: yes we are great! we are the greatest! the double standard is the best thing ever!
it is hard to explain to some americans that bombs and invasion are very very bad things...the brain wash in the USA is much too strong...so is the double standard...dropping nukes on fishermen, using chemicals on farmers for a decade, dropping more bombs than all world wars combined, invading more countries than the roman empire in 2000 years etc...all certain signs of "benevolence"....
is there some special american dictionary where benevolent has a vastly different definition?     
|
Being benevolent is allowing you your sovereignty and self governance. Being benevolent is allowing you to come and go when I could deny you the privilege. Being benevolent is allowing you to eat when I could deny you food. Being benevolent is not enslaving you when I could. Being benevolent is allowing you to live when I could crush you. Etc, etc. etc.
Just as it always has been for the past 30,000 years and as it will continue to be for the foreseeable future. Might is right which you have agreed is correct statement on my part.