View Single Post
Old 06-05-2018, 04:06 PM  
Steve Rupe
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 3,050
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard View Post
We do have to be careful here. As much as I hate Trump (which puts it mildly) we cannot get to the point where anyone can file a lawsuit and force a sitting President to testify under oath every time someone wants to drag them into court. We must ensure there is a legitimate and compelling reason before we force a sitting President to take time out of their schedule.

However, it seems the courts agree this is a legitimate case so they can move forward.

So here is how this plays out.... When President Clinton was under oath for the Whitewater investigation, it was decided it was perfectly acceptable to ask President Clinton about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky. To this day I believe this was out of line and completely inappropriate (and it was the moment I lost faith in the Republican party). But now.... In a case that involves sexual harassment.... They will be able to ask him about every woman who has ever accused him of sexual harassment - and so much more.

MAGA. LOL.
You are wrong about the Clinton case. He lied under oath about Monica during the Paula Jones law suit filed against him which had zero to do with White Water.
Steve Rupe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote