Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt-ADX
From my understanding he meant the DOJ but not like you think. Depends on what moments you are talking about. He basically said a couple times it's 150,000 employees how can there not be biased in some ways and obviously he understands people would think that there is. But the IG found no evidence of it in this case so he defers to the IG's report.
|
No "direct" evidence.. Lawyers use words carefully.. "Depends on what the definition of is, is." Bill Clinton
They called RoRo out on his "threat" later on and he had to readdress his statement.. I don't remember who it was he was exchanging with but they said "You're an attorney and you should know to be every careful with your words."