Quote:
Originally Posted by Bladewire
So he leaked to the media and was fired.
What's your point?
He's untrustworthy as a source because of a leak. False.
You really try hard to invalidate the truth. This is part of your biased psychological defect.
If your "logic" was true jailhouse informants would be invalid, which is not reality.
|
He was fired for breaking the "cardinal rule" and you think that's "nothing?"
He was THE source for the warrant.. His "evidence" was corroborated by HIS OWN leaks.. What part of that do you not get?