Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
it's about times constraints. secondary, she's insigificant to history. We're supposed to elevate her to historical importance simply because she's a woman (who lost 2x)? That's whitewashing history. We don't make it mandatory to learn about every potus loser but we're supposed to here because she's a woman. No.
|
Hillary Clinton was the first woman to be a major party nominee for President. She might be corrupt, she might be sleazy, you might not like her, but you can't say she is insignificant.