Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
since when do we make it mandatory to teach students about the loser in a potus election? since she's a woman? let's get this straight. you think she's significant because she's a woman who lost and we should make that mandatory learning.
why on earth would that be mandatory? there are literally thousands of more important historical figures.
|
That she lost is not the point.
She was the first woman to be nominated by a major party. We tend to study people who were first in their fields.
I'm not saying we need to dedicate a class to her or even a full chapter of a book, but she she shouldn't be washed from history books because Republicans don't like her.
Also, please name the more important figures who are being left out because of her inclusion.