Quote:
Originally Posted by SecondFloor
So this is confusing to me.
First I said that BK had no evidence of a conspiracy against him, then you said there was evidence - in the FBI report - which is why, you claimed, Feinstein wanted it sealed. But Mitch McConnell also wants it sealed. And Pelosi wants it released. And no republicans who have read the report have said anything about a conspiracy.
So the point stands - BK has no evidence of a criminal conspiracy against him, but he still said that in his testimony.
|
The man knows what he did or didn't do.. If he knows he didn't do what he's being accused of then it's pretty easy for himself to conclude there's a conspiracy to smear him.......
Why are her lawyers as well as Feinstein refusing to turn over communications and "evidence?" Why is Grassley asking about communications between the accusers? Because he already knows.. He's not asking questions he doesn't already know the answer to..