Quote:
Originally Posted by crucifissio
you dumb senile fuck you are the one who went back in history with your crusades map...as for your slippery slope argument of "india had trouble so it is OK the UK invaded and robbed them blind" heres an example you might understand "if the UK police did not burn your shitty content, somebody else would have" <---- do you understand the concept of the slippery slope fallacy?
as for your rationalization of british theft, the enforced sale of opium and allround thuggery: AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAA!
|
Of course I went back in history to show where Muslims started out from. This high lighted the truth that they have never changed and to this day still insist on warring with each other.
Yes we took from Nations we ruled, that's the purpose of ruling a country. In India we used Indian troops to rule the country, with them we could never have ruled. So some must have some must have been on our side and seen the benefits of British rule. We also used Indian migrants in ruling Africa, they were essential to the British. So they must have been happy.
People fight for control of a country so they can use the resources. It's why rebels in Yemen, Nigeria, Syria, Libya, etc. Still fight for control of other countries and their own.
Some places you can find more information on the subject.
https://www.quora.com/How-many-Musli...operations-etc
https://geopoliticalfutures.com/unen...im-civil-wars/
https://www.worldwatchmonitor.org/co...lim-countries/
As you see I point out that they started fighting and to this day true Muslims continue to fight. They have to mostly live in peace in the West. In the UK we have a problem with Muslims mixing with young girls.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-45918845
If only these Muslims were to stay apart young girls might be safer.