Quote:
Originally Posted by RazorSharpe
Yes, he has the net cost wrong, but he isn't wrong in recommending the yearly sub. Unless of course you think that $119.88 a year is less than $95.88 a year.
Very nice looking site by the way, SecondFloor.
|
I think you read my post in a defensive way. The bit about 'No wonder you recommended the yearly sub' was based on the fact that he had made a mistake in his figures. Not that I didn't think the yearly sub was cheaper than the correctly priced monthly one
