Quote:
Originally Posted by american pervert
Read the ruling, this doesnt make sense.
1.Primary producers will no longer need to keep records pursuant to 2257. (However, they should maintain the FSC Age Verification form to demonstrate that they have checked the ID of each model on their set.)
2.Secondary producers will no longer be required to maintain any records pursuant to 2257.
3.Webcam companies, tube sites, clips and other sites will no longer be required to keep model information or records unless they are a primary producer. (However, they should continue to verify that all content on their sites is produced legally, and by those over the age of majority.)
--
What doesn't make sense, why would a primary producer not have to keep records, but if you look at the 3rd part it says. " no longer be required to keep model information or records unless they are a primary producer. "
So since he is an "other site" he would have to keep records since he is the primary producer.
|
Dude, I just said what the FSC said. And yes, you are pointing out something that I missed. So, either they have it wrong or something is worded wrong.
I looked at the actual decision and I don't get any of that from what I found, but I suck at legalese. I did get that the warrant-less searches are unconstitutional.
The decision I found was from June and it is at
http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/133681p1.pdf
That is the last FSC case in the 3rd district that findlaw lists.
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/search.h...art=&date_end=
.