Originally Posted by $5 submissions

On the one hand, looting is against the law

On the other, those homes are about to burn anyway. Why not 'spread the wealth' (I believe that's the proper lefty term of art, I maybe mistaken - perhaps, 'liberating the fruits of capitalist exploitation' may be more appropriate-if a bit dated) by legally allowing looters to steal flat screen TVs, art, sound systems, and other stuff that's covered by insurance anyway?

Besides, looting, like pimping, ain't easy-imagine looting a home that's surrounded by a wildfire.

Where do you stand on this pressing issue?