Originally Posted by ilnjscb

It isn't a double standard, because the cases are totally different, and again, even if you were correct, does that now make every bad action in the world legal and acceptable because someone once did a bad thing? There was a robbery without consequences yesterday in northern Kenya, so now every robbery around the world is legal and accepted? Of course that's absurd. The equivalency argument is beneath you.

What I am simply asking is what is the current justification, in this decade, without pointing to any action but those taken by the two parties.