Quote:
Originally Posted by PamWinterReturns
They found thousands of images last year. They have photos of the photos on the walls. On what basis could he lose? Illegal entry? It’s federal land. Harassment? It was reported to them; they didn’t stalk him.
Nine months seems too light even for a plea bargain, given his history. But, why isn’t he in jail for lady year’s haul of thousands of images?
It’s like you get the luring words to read the story but you get partial details. Why didn’t the reporter get more information and ask questions? Why leave us hanging with questions?
A plea for a few photos is acceptable unless he has history with child porn. Where did he obtain it? If providing that information, then the plea bargain makes sense.
I’ll do a little looking around tomorrow. If I start now I’ll be up all night.
|
Possibly it would be hard proving that he printed out the photos and put the photos up there and on the photos and owned the tree house. Maybe he inhabited it later in the original person that created it and put the photos up had moved on?
Anyway the guy is caught he's in jail and he's going to be on probation. He's a marked Man. Good news!