Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard
You ass. I've visited Pearl Harbor. LOL.
I never said that at all. I am saying if the United States had stepped in and confronted Germany before Pearl Harbor it's entirely possible that Germany would have never attacked Poland, France, and then Russia and it's also entirely possible Japan would never have attacked Pearl Harbor. (On the other hand, if the US had confronted Germany in 1938 it's entirely possible Japan would have been even more encouraged to attack the United States.)
What I am saying is this.... The United States, as one of the world's most powerful military forces in the world, can either do nothing and watch events unfold and hope they don't get dragged in OR they can try to prevent from smaller regional issues become much larger. US policy prior to WWII was do nothing and hope we didn't get pulled in. Sometime after WWII / Korea, US policy became to take action to prevent larger conflict.
I am not saying US policy is always right. Sometimes it drags us into things we do not need to be in. Some times it becomes all out war. However, an all out proxy war is much better than a world war.
|
if you see this conflict on a what would be when-view you could also say that if there would have been someone that would see that is is not a good idea to let germany pay for the first ww (what they did NOT start), take them the land away and let the coal workers freeze in winter because the german coal flows to the repair countries - then there probably wouldn't have even been a hitler.