Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBaldBastard
Why do you say "here's the reason" when the article you link lists like 50 reasons, did you not read the article, not understand it, or have some other agenda?
Main reasons it seems from your article..
New setups being run by amateur's not complying with current regulations others have no issues with.. That's more than 50,000 growers..
Less than 20% of cities in California — 89 of 482 — allow retail shops to sell cannabis for recreational use.. Republicans I'd Guess.
And that they cant get banking because its illegal federally.. Republicans again.
---
So maybe change your post to " One year of legal pot sales and California doesn’t have the bustling industry it expected. Here’s why. REPUBLICANS "
Also... Its 100000 x easier to sell pot/grow commercially legally in CA than it is in Amsterdam, and that's after only one year! A friend of mine works for a company that tried to get a licence for Aus the setup cost here was over 20 million, that's to produce a product that they'd have to destroy.. because its not legal here yet... go figure. they declined and setup in CA
|
I didn't read the article until you posted that.. Funny fucking shit onwebcam posted a article with out reading it and proves himself wrong, because he just assumes because sales are low its because "over regulation"..
Meanwhile its because the state didnt over-regulate but instead gave control of regulation to local communities. Turns out most areas didnt allow legal pot sales so the sales are not happening because people can't buy it.
Once again onwebcam shows us why Republican logic is bad for business... by giving local communities the ability to decide to sell pot or not, only 89 of 482 cites decided to allow it.
Guess this shows the Republican mantra of "states rights" is bad for business..
Moral of this topic... onwebcam is a fucking idiot..