Originally Posted by nico-t

"Randazza, who represents conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and many other far-right extremists"

Wait... what? I know of Alex Jones. Sure, he can be a loon. But he is anything but a far right extremist. It is a well know fact he went against Bush and his illegal war. So implying Jones is a "far-right extremists" is the first fallacy. Why can't they be honest? And why do they have to put this deliberate lie in the headline? Low blow to steer people who do not know the facts in their desired direction: Label people as 'far right' so discredit is guaranteed in the mind of the uninformed reader. Very dirty and manipulative, and disrespectful to the objective reader.

Continuing. It looks like simplistic defamatory and insulting labels designed to play on emotions rather than facts are attached to names in the following paragraphs. I don't know many of them, or i have heard of them but don't know their backgrounds. I do know 'Roosh' though, and his background. He is a character who values evolutional traditional roles in sexes and spreads this in a controversial and comical manner, and he is described with the flattering label: Pro-rape misogynist.

Wow. This story is one big defamatory insult, ignoring context and putting one-dimensional hate-labels on persons... wtf. I knew Huffington Post was biased, but this is a whole new level. I am amazed this is coming out of such a well known opinion blog (it seems this is what it is, because it sure as hell isn't an objective news site).

I stopped reading after another preposterous claim written as if it was a fact. Good luck with this amateurish shitrag.