Quote:
Originally Posted by VRPdommy
You have made no case against a NATO alliance no matter any tid-bit bitter truths might be there.
It should not bother any nation who has no wishes take advantage of any single nation.
While not being perfect, I see no better alternatives.
Don't tell me the problem, show me a better way.
|
an alliance is implied weakness...pooty has the off switch to life on earth...does pooty need allies? fuck no...aint nobody going to invade russia EVER...the problem with alliances beyond the above mentioned protection racket is its obvious perpetuation of the problem by means of banning effective defense weapons..."off" is very very good at stopping any sort of invasion...it guarantees you will not be invaded...therefore it is completely detrimental to any plans racketeers have...it is the end of war...
one will naturally argue that if everybody has "off" humanity will wipe itself out, but I argue that if the weak can not persuade the strong to leave them alone even under the threat of mutual destruction, then fuck it there is something wrong with us...invading countries do not have the right to expect safety...
alliances promote further wars by making people go the wrong way...you do not need large armies...you do not need heavy weapons...all you really need is others to consider your tiny country as the sacred land...the ones you dont fuck with...the ones whos name you do not mention in parliament because it is forbidden...is that not beautiful?